Women's Under-19 World Cup: Super Six, key fixtures, stand-out players, and more

The 12 remaining teams will vie for four semi-final spots as the tournament heads towards an exciting conclusion

Raunak Kapoor21-Jan-2023The format
While it is called the Super Six, there are still 12 teams left in the tournament, as the top three sides from the four groups in the group stage have made it to the next round. These include – in that order – Bangladesh, Australia and Sri Lanka from Group A; England, Pakistan and Rwanda from Group B; New Zealand, West Indies and Ireland from Group C; and India, South Africa and UAE from Group D.In the Super Six, teams will be divided into two groups of six each, but each team only plays an additional two matches in this round. For instance, Bangladesh, who topped Group A, will now play South Africa and UAE, who had finished second and third respectively in Group D. Similarly, Group D toppers India will play Australia and Sri Lanka, who were second and third in Group A. Thus, these six teams comprise Super Six Group 1.Over to Group 2 in Super Six, which consists of England, West Indies, Ireland, New Zealand, Pakistan and Rwanda. England had topped Group B, and will thus play West Indies and Ireland, who had come second and third from Group C. On the other hand, New Zealand, who were first from Group C, will meet Pakistan and Rwanda from Group B in the Super Six.Related

  • Hyderabad prodigy Trisha hopes to live father's dreams at U-19 WC

  • Scrivens, England's natural-born leader, prepares to take on the world

  • Unlikely hat-tricker, keeper-commentator… simple things stand out

Also, teams carry forward the points and the net run rate from the group stage from the two matches against the other teams from their group who also qualified for the Super Six. So India’s points and net run rate against fourth-placed Scotland will not be included; the same for New Zealand against Indonesia, and England against Zimbabwe, etc.Eventually, the top two teams from each of the two Super Six groups advance to the semi-finals.Who are the favourites after the group stage?
The four group toppers are best placed to make the semi-finals after the Super Six stage. Bangladesh, England, New Zealand and India were group winners, with three wins out of three. While India, England and New Zealand dominated each of their games, Bangladesh were tested to a degree by Australia and Sri Lanka, but otherwise looked comfortable. With two wins carried forward for each of the table toppers, if they win their two super six games, they will cruise to the semi-final. No other team will be able to reach four wins.Shweta Sehrawat (left) is the highest run-getter of the tournament so far•ICC via GettyKey fixtures
India vs Australia on January 21 will headline the Super Six line up. Bangladesh’s opening-day win over Australia means India will now have arguably the toughest Super Six fixtures against Australia and Sri Lanka. What is more, India play Sri Lanka the very next day on January 22.New Zealand have had it quite easy so far after restricting Indonesia and Ireland to 74 each, and West Indies to 68 in the group stage. While they took 27 of 30 wickets, they lost just one across the three matches, having had to bat for less than 24 overs so far. But their biggest test will be against Pakistan on January 24.Stand-out players
India’s Shweta Sehrawat leads the run-scoring charts with 197 runs in three games, along with the tournament’s highest individual score of 92* against South Africa. Sehrawat has faced 116 balls so far without yet being dismissed. Shafali Verma, India’s captain and Sehrawat’s opening partner, is striking at 233.96, the highest by some distance in the tournament, with scores of 45 from 16 deliveries, and 78 off 34. But she missed out in the last group game against Scotland.England captain Grace Scrivens was very impressive in the group stage. She has 120 runs in three innings, and five wickets to go with that.The top three six-hitters of the tournament feature two names from Bangladesh: Afia Prottasha with five – just as many hit by Shafali – and Shorna Akter with four.England captain Grace Scrivens was very impressive in the group stage•Getty/ICCWhat to expect?
In spite of the unfriendly schedule, India start firm favourites against both Australia and Sri Lanka. Sehrawat’s form and G Trisha’s runs in the group stage mean India do not rely only on the experience of Shafali and Richa Ghosh. Moreover, they will also take confidence after restricting UAE to 97, and Scotland to 66.England should cruise through to the semi-final with fixtures against Ireland and West Indies, both of whom have looked well below par when up against formidable opposition.New Zealand have a potentially tricky game against Pakistan, who troubled England in phases with the ball but couldn’t stay in the game with the bat. That New Zealand start their Super Six campaign against Rwanda could mean their batting remains untested ahead of their match against Pakistan.Bangladesh have been outstanding in the group stage. If they keep up the standard they did against Australia and Sri Lanka, they should cruise past UAE and hosts South Africa, who have had their moments with the ball, but got only 112 against both Scotland and UAE in the group stage, even if they won both matches. And so it is their bowling and catching that have largely kept them alive in the tournament.The tournament has already given us one run-out at the non-striker’s end, two hat-tricks – including a haul of four wickets in as many consecutive balls – along with a highest team score of 219 by India, and a lowest of 25 by Zimbabwe. But what have been missing so far is a century by a batter, and a Super Over finish.

Women's IPL – All you need to know about the bidding process and auction

Who are the bidders? Which cities are in the fray? What is the auction purse? Here are all the answers

ESPNcricinfo staff24-Jan-20230:28

Perry: ‘Everyone in world cricket is excited for the WIPL’

The build-up towards the inaugural Women’s IPL (WIPL) has reached fever pitch. After completing an astounding media rights deal that will fetch it approximately USD 116.7 million over a five-year period, the BCCI is set to unveil the five franchise owners – along with the cities they have bid for – on January 25. Here’s a ready reckoner from ESPNcricinfo with the lowdown on the auction process, the list of bidders, and the auction purse.
Who are the prospective bidders in the fray?
As many as 33 interested parties – including all ten men’s IPL franchises – had initially expressed interest by securing the tender document. But on Monday, only 17 entities submitted technical bids, including seven men’s IPL franchises: Mumbai Indians, Delhi Capitals, Kolkata Knight Riders, Punjab Kings, Rajasthan Royals, Sunrisers Hyderabad and Royal Challengers Bangalore.The other bidders include Adani Group, Capri. Global, Haldiram’s Group, Torrent Pharma, Apollo Pipes, Amrit Leela Enterprises, Shriram Group and Slingshot 369 Ventures Private Limited.Related

WPL set to be played from March 4 to 24; IPL final likely on May 28

Women's IPL: Viacom 18 wins rights, to pay INR 7.09 crore per match

Healy: 'Women's IPL is going to change women's cricket for the better'

Inaugural Women's IPL likely to be played from March 3 to 26

Is there a set base price? And what is the auction process?
No base price has been set by the BCCI. Bidders will submit their bids in a sealed envelope. Bids will be accepted for a ten-year period, but the winners will own the team for perpetuity just like the owners of the men’s IPL franchises do. Bidders will vie for one of the ten cities the BCCI has shortlisted as home bases.The cities are (stadium capacity in brackets): Ahmedabad (112,560), Kolkata (65,000), Chennai (50,000), Bengaluru (42,000), Delhi (55,000), Dharamsala (20,900), Guwahati (38,650), Indore (26,900), Lucknow (48,800) and Mumbai, which has three grounds – the Wankhede, DY Patil and Brabourne Stadiums.Can a bid be made for more than one city?
Bidders have been given the option of contesting more than one franchise or city, but the BCCI will award them only the city they have bid a higher amount for. In case two of the highest bids for a single venue are equal, a re-bid will take place.And if the highest bids for two venues from two different bidders are the same, the BCCI will have the “discretion to decide the order”. In case a bidder raises the top bid for more than one city, the bidder can choose its preferred venue.The auction for Women’s IPL is expected to be held in the first week of February•BCCIWill the highest bid be the winning bid?
In the bid document, BCCI has said that it is not “obliged to accept highest monetary offer”, and has listed some objectives it will look into before finalising the winner. These include: “establishing a stable, successful, financially secure, long-term Franchise to participate in the League; ensuring the widest coverage and the widest possible audience for the League; assisting in the development of the game of women’s cricket in India at all levels; maximizing and enhancing exposure, wherever possible, for each of the official sponsors of the League; and, increasing and enhancing exposure for women’s cricket in India both within India and the rest of the world.”When is the player auction?
No firm date has been announced by the BCCI, but the auction is expected to be held in the first week of February. The BCCI has already concluded the player-registration process as a first step towards conducting the auction.Sunrisers Hyderabad are one of seven men’s IPL franchises to submit a bid for Women’s IPL•BCCIWhat is the auction purse?
INR 12 crore (USD 1.46 million approx.) will be the auction purse for the inaugural season. Each team can buy a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 18 players, including seven overseas players including at least one Associate player. Unlike in the men’s IPL, WIPL teams will have the option of fielding up to five overseas players in the XI, provided one is from an Associate country.What about the tournament dates?
Although not officially announced, ESPNcricinfo understands that a window between March 3 and 26 has been carved out.What will the tournament’s format be?
A total of 22 matches will be played in the inaugural season, with each team playing the other twice to make it a total of eight games per team. The top-ranked team will enter the final directly, while the second- and third-placed teams will face off in a Qualifier to determine the second finalist.

Unsettled unit, confusing selection calls make it a season to forget for SRH

Heinrich Klaasen and Mayank Markande were the only bright spots in another disappointing season for Sunrisers Hyderabad

Ashish Pant21-May-20232:41

What were the reasons for SRH’s early exit?

Where they finished

Position on table: Bottom of the ten-team pack, with eight points
Wins: Four
Losses: TenSunrisers Hyderabad came into IPL 2023 as one of the more balanced-looking teams, but things just didn’t fall into place for them. They lost their first two games and won the next two, but three losses on the bounce thereon caused their campaign to nosedive quickly, and it never looked up after that. This was the third straight season that SRH have failed to get past the league stage and the second time in three years that they have finished bottom.

The Good – Klaasen and Markande make a mark

In an otherwise bleak season, Heinrich Klaasen and Mayank Markande were the standout performers for SRH. Both players were given an extended run and they made it count.Markande manned the middle overs for SRH, picking up 11 of his 12 wickets in that phase, and was easily the team’s best spinner. He finished with an economy rate of 7.89, the second-best for his side (minimum 50 balls bowled) behind Mayank Dagar, and was the second-highest wicket-taker behind Bhuvneshwar Kumar.Klaasen almost single-handedly carried SRH’s batting this season. He packed a punch whenever he came out to bat and in every phase. Klaasen was SRH’s leading run-scorer by some distance and one of the few positives to come out of the team’s disappointing batting show this season.1:30

Moody: ‘Lot of question marks around SRH’s selection process’

The Bad – an unsettled unit

“He’s a player with the X-factor, bowls at 150kph, but I don’t really know what’s happening behind the scenes.” That was captain Aiden Markram’s reply on May 18 regarding Umran Malik’s prolonged absence from the playing XI, and it suggested that all wasn’t well in the SRH camp. It seemed so all through the season.SRH failed to zero in on a settled unit, both on the batting and bowling fronts. They fielded 23 players in all – joint-most for any team – with very few getting a long run. And, it started right at the top. SRH used seven opening combinations, second only to Kolkata Knight Riders, with no pair getting more than four games.Barring Klaasen, SRH did not have a single batter in the top 30 of the run-getters’ list and not one bowler managed to get into the top ten of the wicket-takers’ list either. Washington Sundar being ruled out with a hamstring injury midway through the season also threw a spanner in SRH’s works.Another reason behind SRH’s weak season was their key batters not turning up. They splurged a total of INR 21.50 crore on Harry Brook and Mayank Agarwal, but both had mediocre seasons – really, just one innings of substance each.Brook, apart from the century against KKR did not cross 30 even once and scored three ducks. He was also benched for a couple of games. Agarwal crossed fifty just once this season – in the final league game – and averaged just 27.0 with a strike rate of 128.57. Both batters were constantly shuffled around in the batting order, which might not have helped.In his first year as captain, Markram left a lot to be desired. But was he in charge? Some of the selection calls led to former SRH head coach Tom Moody saying that Markram might have had “very little say on selection”.

Poll

Top performer – Heinrich Klaasen

Klaasen stood head and shoulders above anyone in the team – his takedown of spin will remain one of the highlights of IPL 2023. Klaasen finished with 448 runs in 11 innings, striking at 177.07, with two fifties and a century. He struck at 191.30 against spin – the second-best strike rate for any batter who has faced a minimum of 50 balls this season – and was equally formidable against pace.

The Highlights

  • With his 104 against RCB, Klaasen became the fourth SRH batter to score a century in the IPL behind David Warner (twice), Jonny Bairstow and Harry Brook.
  • For all their batting frailties, SRH were one of only two teams to have two centurions this season.
  • Against Rajasthan Royals, SRH successfully chased down a target in excess of 200 for the first time in the IPL. It was also the joint-third-highest chase in IPL history.

Stats – Williamson at the top of the Test charts for New Zealand

Williamson has gone past Ross Taylor to become the all-time highest run-getter for New Zealand in Test cricket

Sampath Bandarupalli27-Feb-20237787 – Runs scored by Kane Williamson in Test cricket. He is now the leading run-getter for New Zealand in Tests, surpassing Ross Taylor’s 7683. Williamson overhauled Taylor’s tally in 20 fewer matches and 35 fewer innings.53.33 – Williamson’s average in Test cricket is by far the highest for a New Zealand player (minimum 20 appearances). The next best is Martin Crowe at 45.36.ESPNcricinfo Ltd26 – Test centuries for Williamson, the only New Zealand batter with 20-plus centuries. The next best is Taylor with 19. Williamson has five double centuries to his name in Test cricket, the most by a New Zealander. His nine 150-plus scores and 59 fifty-plus scores in the format are also the highest for New Zealand.3930 – Test runs for Williamson at home – the most by a New Zealand player. He surpassed Taylor’s 3905 runs during his century against England in Wellington. Williamson has played 43 Tests in New Zealand, with 32 fifty-plus scores, including 14 centuries, both being the highest.63.38 – Williamson’s batting average in home Tests, the highest for any New Zealand batter with a minimum of 1000 runs. It is also the fifth-highest average for any player with a minimum of 3000 runs at home.16.06 – Percentage of New Zealand’s runs scored by Williamson in the 91 Tests he has played. This is the highest percentage of team runs for a New Zealand batter to have played 50-plus Tests.9 – Williamson has scored at least one century against all the nine Test teams he has played – Australia (2), Bangladesh (3), England (4), India (2), Pakistan (5), South Africa (3), Sri Lanka (3), West Indies (3) and Zimbabwe (1). He is the only New Zealand player to score hundreds against nine nations in Test cricket and one of the 13 players overall.2 – Number of players with at least 20 Test appearances for a country with the most runs, fifty-plus scores, centuries, double-centuries and the highest average for their country in Test cricket, including Williamson for New Zealand. Like Williamson, Kumar Sangakkara tops all those lists for Sri Lanka in Test cricket.

How much impact has the Impact Player rule had on IPL 2023?

While the rule has given local players more chances to shine, high-impact batting innings from subs have been few. Could some suffer from coming into the game cold?

Matt Roller18-Apr-20231:36

The Impact Player rule – will part-time bowlers lose out?

Halfway through Royal Challengers Bangalore’s game against Delhi Capitals on Saturday afternoon, history told Faf du Plessis that they had enough runs. “In normal circumstances in a day game, 175 [174] feels like a really good score,” he said after the game.”[But] with the new rule – the extra batter – you just feel like you need more runs…” he added. “You feel like it’s maybe 10 or 15 runs you need to get more.” After taking four early wickets, Royal Challengers eventually closed out a 23-run victory, but the batting depth enabled by the new rule saw Lalit Yadav walk out as low as No. 9 in Capitals’ chase.Du Plessis’ analysis was near-perfect. The average first-innings score in IPL 2023 so far is 183.4. It was 12.3 runs lower in IPL 2022 at 171.1; at the equivalent stage in the tournament, it was 8.8 runs lower at 174.6. There have been as many 200-plus totals chased down this year as there have sub-190 totals defended (two of each).!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();

It was telling that du Plessis described the Impact Player rule as “the extra batter”. In most T20 cricket, teams are forced to make a choice between fielding a batting-heavy or a bowling-heavy side; in IPL 2023, the introduction of a substitute player has enabled them to pick a bowling-heavy side when they bowl, and a batting-heavy side when they bat.Across the first 24 games of the season – around one-third of the league stage – the majority of teams have used the rule in a very similar way. If they bat first, they hand in a teamsheet featuring an extra batter, then substitute in a bowler at the innings break – often making a call between an additional spinner or seamer.If they bowl first, they name a team which features an extra bowler, then take off a tailender and bring in a batter – either at the fall of the relevant wicket or, if the batter is a better fielder than the bowler he is replacing, when the bowler’s spell is complete. “It feels to me like we’re just playing 12 on 12 rather than 11 on 11,” said Mike Hussey, Chennai Super Kings’ batting coach.Related

Mike Hesson: 'There are no soft overs now. Sides keep coming hard at you all the time'

Capital collapse: Delhi's problems start with Warner and Shaw

Using the Impact Player – how have teams gone about it so far?

Occasionally, teams have subbed on additional batters in place of an already-dismissed batter when they are struggling in their first innings: Punjab Kings subbed in Sikandar Raza for Prabhsimran Singh when they were 63 for 4 in the ninth over against Sunrisers Hyderabad, while Royal Challengers brought in Anuj Rawat for Mahipal Lomror at 132 for 6 in 15th over against Capitals.Will the Impact rule breed a feeling of disconnect?Being involved in a substitution might sound like the club cricketer’s dream: in the past week, both Harry Brook and Venkatesh Iyer have been substituted at the innings break after making hundreds, putting their feet up in the dugout while their team-mates do the hard work in the field.But in practice, most professionals want to be involved. “It’s a funny one,” Tim David, who has twice been involved in a substitution, said. “I really feel like I’m in a good place to contribute as a fielder for the team, and if I need to bowl… there are going to be guys over the course of the season that are going to be in and out with the Impact Player. That’s just for us to [accept that] we’re doing the best thing for the team.”Batters who are substituted into the game at the interval have had mixed results: Venkatesh, for example, made 83 off 40 against Gujarat Titans as an Impact Player, but others like Prithvi Shaw have struggled badly – perhaps in part due to the fact they have been sitting still in the dugout during the first innings, rather than keeping their bodies loose in the field.”A player of his quality, at his age, he should want to be in the thick of things all the time and not say, ‘I’m happy as the Impact Player,'” Ravi Shastri said on ESPNcricinfo’s T20 Time:Out show, addressing Capitals’ use of Shaw. “You want him contributing… rather than getting into a habit of ‘I’m only going to bat and then feet up in the dressing room.’ That’s not good for a guy at his age, 23.”There is a contrary view. Having closed out Mumbai’s victory over Capitals last week, David said: “At the moment, I’ve been the Impact Player: I get to sit down for 20 overs and watch and by the time I came out to bat I was fresh. Maybe that helped me get back for a quick two at the end of the game?”Freeing up the top orderEven if there have only been a handful of notable performances from batters introduced as Impact Players, the rule has still had an impact. As any top-order batter will tell you, batting depth has a liberating effect. “It allows you to just keep going and play with so much freedom,” Jos Buttler said after England’s victory over India in the 2022 T20 World Cup semi-final, in which Chris Jordan was due to bat at No. 10.Increased opportunities for local playersThe rule has also tested the depth of India’s talent pool. In IPL 2021, a single round of fixtures (each team playing once) involved a minimum of 56 Indian players: eight teams, at least seven local players each. In IPL 2023, with the Impact rule coming in, there are a minimum of 80 Indian players – 10 teams, at least eight players each – involved in each round, a 43% increase.That increase has played out in practice. In the first 24 games of the 2021 season, 76 Indian players featured. In the first 24 games of 2022, with an increase from eight to 10 teams, 91 Indian players featured. In the first 24 games of 2023, with the addition of the Impact Player rule, 107 Indian players have featured.!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();

With several leading Indian players also absent through injury, a number of young, uncapped players have won opportunities, while some veterans who had struggled for opportunities in recent seasons – such as Piyush Chawla, Mohit Sharma and Amit Mishra – have made returns to the IPL.The genuine allrounder has not gone out of fashionThere were concerns that the introduction of the new rule would negate the role of the allrounder, but it has not played out that way. In fact, there appears to have been a marginal in the number of allrounders: each match this season has seen 1.54 players per game batting in the top six and bowling two or more overs; at the equivalent stage of IPL 2022, that figure was 1.29.Certain allrounders, who are more occasional bowlers, have been used sparingly: Rahul Tewatia, Riyan Parag and Shivam Dube are among the players who have yet to bowl a ball in IPL 2023 after sporadic usage last season. But genuine allrounders like Sam Curran, Ravindra Jadeja and Krunal Pandya have still been just as important to their respective teams.The Impact Player rule is still nascent, and we may see new, inventive tactics employed as the season wears on. But at this stage, the early trends are clear: “the extra batter”, as du Plessis terms it, has emboldened teams to aim bigger, playing a significant part in a high-scoring start to the IPL season.

Stats – Defending champions New Zealand's sharp slide in a forgettable WTC cycle

Drawing a blank overseas, slumping pacers and wasting home advantage have left them at eighth out of nine teams in the points table

S Rajesh07-Mar-2023With just one series to go for them in the current cycle, it would be fair to say that New Zealand’s defence of their World Test Championship crown has gone rather badly. They are currently languishing in eighth place out of nine teams; and in fact, their opponents in this last series, Sri Lanka, still have the chance of making the final if they win both Tests.ESPNcricinfo LtdUnder normal circumstances, you would scoff at the possibility of Sri Lanka winning two out of two Tests in New Zealand. After all, they have won only one out of nine Test series in New Zealand, and that victory came way back in 1995. In 19 Tests in the country spanning 40 years, Sri Lanka have won exactly two; now they need to double that tally in a couple of weeks to give themselves any chance of qualifying for the final. However, thanks to New Zealand’s poor form in this cycle, Sri Lanka might fancy their chances of pulling off the improbable.How did New Zealand fall so steeply from being champions in the last cycle to rank eighth in the current one? Here are the key numbers comparing their previous campaign to this entirely forgettable one.

No longer unbeatable at home

What should give Sri Lanka the greatest encouragement is the fact that New Zealand were beaten by Bangladesh in a home Test last year. They recovered to win the second Test and draw the series, but their eight-wicket defeat encapsulates their dismal defence of the WTC crown.ESPNcricinfo LtdIn six home Tests in the current cycle, New Zealand only have a 3-3 win-loss record, with drawn series against Bangladesh, South Africa and England. This includes the two Tests against England which isn’t part of the WTC. Had England scored two more runs in that Wellington chase, New Zealand’s home record would have been 2-4. That is a huge slide from the 2019-21 cycle, when they had a 7-0 winning record in eight Tests at home.

Drawing a blank overseas

In the 2019-21 cycle, New Zealand had a 3-4 win-loss record overseas. They were clean swept 3-0 in Australia, but won a Test in Sri Lanka and two in England, including the WTC final (Their 1-0 win in England in 2021 wasn’t a part of the WTC).

Since that final, New Zealand haven’t won any of their seven overseas Tests, though they came close twice in Pakistan. Their results in England illustrate their slump: in 2021 they triumphed 1-0, but a year later they had no answers to England’s new-found aggression in a 3-0 series defeat. Surprisingly, since 2019, New Zealand have a 3-1 record against England in Tests which are not a part of the WTC, but 0-3 in Tests which are part of it.

The pace slump

Tim Southee took 70 wickets in 14 Tests at 21.2, Neil Wagner’s 55 wickets came at 22.87, Kyle Jamieson took 46 wickets at an incredible 14.17 and Trent Boult’s 46 wickets came at a slightly higher but still respectable average of 28.34. Together, New Zealand’s famed pace attack led their march to the WTC title in 2021, taking 242 wickets in 16 matches – that’s 15 per Test – at 24.16 (including the four Tests that weren’t part of the WTC).

They were particularly impressive at home, but didn’t do badly abroad either: Southee’s 70 wickets included match hauls of 6 for 78 in Colombo, 9 for 162 in Perth and 7 for 80 at Lord’s; Wagner took 17 wickets from three Tests in Australia at 22.76.ESPNcricinfo LtdIn the current cycle, though, Southee’s form has gone south – 45 wickets at 37.11 – while the others haven’t picked up the slack either. The absence of Boult and Jamieson hasn’t helped, and all these factors have contributed in the pace average dropping by almost 35%. Even when New Zealand have played their best attack, opposition batters have still found a way: Bangladesh scored 458 in that famous Mount Maunganui victory against a New Zealand attack consisting of Southee, Boult, Jamieson and Wagner.

Batters waste home advantage

New Zealand’s 7-0 home record in the 2019-21 cycle was built on solid contributions from their batters all the way down the order, from Tom Latham to Jamieson (226 runs at 56.5), Mitchell Santner (174 at 58) and even Wagner (117 at 39). Overall, their batters averaged 47.84 runs per wicket in eight home Tests (including the runs added through extras, that average goes up to 51.26.)

But in the last couple of years, that average has dropped quite significantly to 31.58. Their former captain and batting talisman Kane Williamson has had a relatively quiet period. He has played only seven of New Zealand’s 13 Tests in this cycle, and just two out of six at home. Williamson has scored 557 runs at 46.41 in these 13 Tests, but 332 of those – 59.6% – came in two innings, including an unbeaten 200 in Karachi. Seven times he was dismissed before reaching 25.

However, in the previous WTC cycle, Williamson was the standout batter at home, scoring 895 runs at 99.44. Six other batters scored 200-plus runs at 40-plus averages. Add their pace-bowling strength at home, and it isn’t difficult to see how New Zealand built the results they did. This time around, only Devon Conway and Tom Blundell have shown outstanding form at home. Latham’s average of 41.7 is boosted by an innings of 252 against Bangladesh, as in seven out of ten innings, he has been dismissed under 20.With the fast bowlers fading as well, the defending champions have fallen rather quickly from their pedestal. Thankfully for them, they have a chance to start afresh after this two-Test series against Sri Lanka.

CPL 3rd week round-up: Royals' fluctuating fortunes continue; Patriots still winless

Cornwall smashed a century off 45 balls for Royals, while TKR found a new face in left-arm wristspinner Waqar Salamkheil

Rvel Zahid04-Sep-2023 Barbados Royals’ marvelous turnaround after heaviest CPL defeatEarly in the third week of the CPL, Knight Riders chased down 179 against Patriots, as all their big names delivered. Then they waltzed their way to a pulverising 133-run win over Royals, who were bundled for just 61 in pursuit of 195. That turned out to be the heaviest defeat by margin of runs in the history of the tournament.Martin Guptill hogged the limelight with an unbeaten 100 from only 58 balls despite having started with a run-a-ball 20. Earlier this year, Guptill had slammed the first century of this year’s PSL, something which he repeated at the CPL too this season.Related

Rayudu, Muzarabani end CPL stints with Patriots after three games

CPL week two: Tallawahs' Pakistani flavour; Warriors' WI's flavour

Elbow injury cuts short Faf du Plessis' CPL season

But in just about 24 hours, Rovman Powell galvanised his team into action, as Royals comfortably chased down 161 against defending champions Jamaica Tallawahs.Tallawahs opener Alex Hales failed to create an impact in his first game of season, while on the other hand, Alick Athanaze’s mature knock of 76 for Royals eclipsed Shamarh Brooks’ 78 for Tallawahs. Athanaze stole the show with his pyrotechnics in a crunch situation, as he continues making big strides in the nascent stage of his career. After scoring the joint-fastest fifty on ODI debut against UAE in June, he gave resounding proof of his batting prowess with a match-winning knock against Tallawahs.But at the post-match presentation, Powell urged those concerned to manage Athanaze well: “I think he has a very good future. It’s important that West Indies look at that, and start managing him. We have seen players play all three formats in such quick time. There is a lot of talent in the Caribbean, but the problem is we don’t harness that talent.”Thereon, Royals’ topsy-turvy campaign continued as they suffered a 90-run defeat at the hands of St Lucia Kings. However, they saved their best batting performance for the last game of the Barbados leg, which came against Patriots. Royals beat the bottom-placed Patriots by hunting down 221 with as many as eight wickets and 11 deliveries to spare.Johnson Charles struck 78 off 52 balls against Barbados Royals•CPL T20 via Getty ImagesIt was ‘Cornball’ all the way: Rahkeem Cornwall ruled the roost with a jaw-dropping century that put his team in the driver’s seat before retiring hurt on 102 seemingly because of tiredness. Given how Royals’ top order had been struggling before the final game of week three, not many would have envisaged that they would gun down the mammoth target rather convincingly.Cornwall entertained the home crowd splendidly with his power-hitting, as one of his 12 sixes included a monstrous 110-meter hit which surpassed Kieron Pollard’s 107-meter six earlier in the tournament. Cornwall then bettered his own record by crashing a 111-meter six over backward square. He got to his hundred off 45 balls, and followed that with a bat-drop celebration.St Lucia Kings’ juggernaut rolls on with Raza at the helmStand-in captain Sikandar Raza hasn’t let Kings’ intensity drop a wee bit after regular captain Faf du Plessis’ departure for a surgery for his long-standing tennis-elbow injury. Under Raza, Kings beat Royals by 90 runs, further solidifying their hold at the top of the table after three wins from their last five games, two of which were washed out by rain.Waqar Salamkheil got 2 for 21 in the two-run win over Jamaica Tallawahs•CPL T20 via Getty ImagesSalamkheil helps Trinbago Knight Riders clinch nail-biterKnight Riders edged past Tallawahs by two runs while defending 142, as Waqar Salamkheil followed up his 4 for 14 against Royals with 2 for 21. Royals needed 12 in the final over of the chase, before Imad Wasim’s boundary brought it down to eight off five balls. But Ali Khan bowled three dots in a row, and though Imad hit a four again, he could manage only a leg bye out of the remaining four required off the last delivery.Earlier, during Knight Riders’ innings, Tallawahs’ debutant Kelvin Pitman picked up 3 for 27, including the wickets of Nicholas Pooran and Pollard. And though Pitman’s efforts went in vain, Tallawahs will be pleased with his performance as the group stage nears its business end.St Kitts and Nevis Patriots’ woeful campaign continuesPatriots’ fortunes couldn’t change either under Evin Lewis or Sherfane Rutherford, as they suffered a massive defeat against Amazon Warriors. Patriots made a forgettable start to the third week, succumbing for 88 in pursuit of 187 after Dwaine Pretorius dented them early with three wickets.That was followed by a big defeat at the hands of Royals despite raking up 220, which included half-centuries from Rutherford, Will Smeed and Andre Fletcher. That meant six losses in a row after their first two matches were washed out, keeping them at only two points from eight matches. With Rutherford leading against Royals, Patriots were let down by the bowlers and he also rued the fielding lapses after the loss.”Nothing is guaranteed, so we just need to keep a good mindset, stick together, and anything can happen,” he said.

A Caribbean calamity – how West Indies botched their ODI World Cup chances

The fielding was awful, preparation and team selection equally bad, and they didn’t really give themselves a fighting chance

Firdose Moonda01-Jul-2023The ‘worst fielding side’ around
Ten catches went down in the group stage, the ground fielding was poor on the whole, and that’s simply not good enough.Not all of the West Indies’ spills carried massive consequences. Even dropping Gajanand Singh when on 0 in the tournament opener, where he went on to score 101*, did not prevent them from securing a win. But some of them did. The five against Zimbabwe might have been the difference between 200 and 268, and cost West Indies points they could have carried over to the Super Six.On that occasion, they put down Sikandar Raza on 1 and then on 3, and he went on to score 68 and share in a match-winning 87-run stand with Ryan Burl, who was also dropped once. Coach Daren Sammy was so frustrated that he labelled West Indies the “worst fielding side” at the qualifier.And then they put down a crucial chance in the Super Six, too. Defending a below-par 181, West Indies took a wicket with their first ball and had an opportunity for a second in the 12th over – Brandon McMullen was on 21 when he drilled Akeal Hosein to Kyle Mayers at midwicket. But Mayers put it down and McMullen went on to score 69 and put Scotland on the doorstep of victory.It was difficult for West Indies to put first-choice playing XIs on the field, and it showed•ICC via Getty ImagesIllness, injury, and iffy playing XIs
With illnesses – most teams have had some form of winter flu affecting their camp – and injuries, it has been difficult for West Indies to always field a first-choice XI.They batted Johnson Charles at No. 3 for the first time in his career in the opening three matches even though he is an opening batter. Their reason was that Shamarh Brooks’ illness had opened up a spot. Would moving Shai Hope to one-drop have made more sense?Yannick Cariah’s injury meant West Indies couldn’t capitalise on his pre-tournament form and also took away their only legspinner. The performances of Wanindu Hasaranga and Chris Greaves suggest it would have been handy for West Indies to have one.The Super Over mess
After Logan van Beek had plundered 28 runs off 14 balls, mostly hitting to the short leg-side boundary at Takashinga Cricket Club, it was inexplicable that West Indies chose to bowl from the Pavilion End to him in the Super Over, where they gave him the same advantage.That’s the decision West Indies made and they tasked Jason Holder with delivering the six balls that would decide the match. He started with two full-tosses, then went short and wide, and could not adjust his lengths to test van Beek’s defence against the yorker at all. The result was 4, 6, 4, 6, 6 and 4, and 31 runs for West Indies to chase. They stopped well short.When asked afterwards who made the decision to bowl Holder in the Super Over, Sammy didn’t comment, but a few breaths later, he said he had “full faith” in the captain’s decisions.There is a lot to talk about when it comes to West Indies cricket, and most of it is likely to be unpleasant•ICC via Getty ImagesPowell’s power reaps no rewards
Rovman Powell, West Indies’ vice-captain, played the opening two group matches, and showed none of the sense of responsibility that comes with his title and failed to provide the lower-order firepower West Indies desperately needed.Coming in at 192 for 5 against USA, Powell picked out long-off with a nothing shot the ball after Nicholas Pooran was caught at sweeper cover to fall for a golden duck. West Indies lost six wickets for 105 in that match and did not make 300.Against Nepal, with West Indies in a strong position at 310 for 5, Powell slugged a waist-high full-toss to long-on, and after being trapped lbw for 1 against Zimbabwe, something needed to be done about him.West Indies acted.They explained that leaving him out of the XI against Netherlands was an effort to balance the side, which was also without a hamstrung Mayers, and needed an extra bowling option. Romario Shepherd was included in Powell’s place and Mayers returned for the Scotland match with Shepherd kept his place and Powell still confined to the bench.Not the ideal preparation
West Indies played a series in the UAE to prepare for the qualifier, but not all of them were there together. Six of the 15 that travelled to Zimbabwe – Mayers, Holder, Powell, Alzarri Joseph, Shepherd and Akeal Hosein – were not involved in those matches.Understandably, they were given a break after the end of the IPL, but it also meant that their first interaction with a new coach (though one they have known as a player for long) came at a crunch tournament and the lack of cohesion showed.When asked to respond to Carl Hooper’s comment that the situation facing West Indies was “distressing”, Holder said he had been shutting out outside noise. Only to be reminded that Hooper was inside the camp, as the new assistant coach.And then there was the choice of warm-up series. Day-night games in the desert did little to help West Indies ready themselves for the chilly, dew-dropped southern African mornings, where the ball moves substantially in the first hour and, when put in, their batters showed a lack of assurance. West Indies were 14 for 2 against USA, 55 for 3 against Nepal, and 81 for 6 against Scotland in the game that saw them cede any chances of going to the World Cup.

Netherlands run themselves out of the World Cup

For the first time in 4691 ODIs, a team lost four of their top five to run-outs, and it cost Netherlands dearly

Hemant Brar03-Nov-2023In the fifth over of the Netherlands innings, Max O’Dowd pushed towards mid-off and scampered a single. Rashid Khan was quick to the ball but missed the direct hit. Despite his dive, O’Dowd would have been out had Rashid been on target.O’Dowd’s escape was the warning Netherlands ignored. What followed had catastrophic consequences for their chances of making the semi-finals of this World Cup and damaged their prospects of qualifying for the 2025 Champions Trophy. A campaign that had soared with wins against South Africa and Bangladesh had suffered a frenetic crash landing.”Definitely not ideal,” Netherlands captain Scott Edwards said after the defeat to Afghanistan. “Sort of beat yourself a little bit in that sense. Four run-outs in our top five or six batters – hard to come back from that. I think we started well and set up ourselves for a good total there. Yeah, gave a few wickets away. They have obviously got quality spinners through the middle and we didn’t have our top-order batters in there to face them.”Related

Shahidi dedicates Afghanistan win to refugees in Pakistan

Nabi the hustler sends Netherlands spinning

Champions Trophy qualification at stake at ODI World Cup

As it happened – Afghanistan's fourth win

Nabi, Shahidi, Rahmat boost Afghanistan's semi-final chances

After opting to bat in Lucknow, Netherlands lost Wesley Barresi in the first over, but their recovery was so good that their score of 66 for 1 in ten overs was not just their best powerplay performance this World Cup, it was also the best in nine ODIs at this venue.Afghanistan went into an emergency huddle and Rashid, who hurt himself while attempting the aforementioned run-out, returned to lead the talk. The huddle took so long that umpire Nitin Menon had to nudge the players twice to get on with it. Mohammad Nabi said later the gist of the conversation was “bowl in the right areas and they will make mistakes”.The first of those mistakes came in the 12th over when O’Dowd paddled the ball towards fine leg and tried to come back for the second run. Azmatullah Omarzai, who was at deep-backward square leg, sprinted to his right, cut down the angle, picked up cleanly, and nailed the direct hit. O’Dowd’s dive did not save him this time.A direct hit from the deep was just the inspiration Afghanistan needed. A combination of a new batter, relaxed fielding restrictions, and disciplined bowling resulted in Netherlands scoring only 19 off the next 41 balls.Sybrand Engelbrecht was the one really struggling, having scored only 12 off 31. In the 19th over, he stepped out to Nabi and drilled the ball towards mid-off. He took off immediately for a single but Colin Ackermann was ball-watching for a second at the non-striker’s end. Even if Ackermann had responded instantly, he would have still been out. That’s how poor Engelbrecht’s judgment was, and as Ackermann walked off shaking his head, he did not make eye contact with his partner.Afghanistan were back in the game but Netherlands, at 92 for 3, were not out of it either. Their middle and lower order had bailed them out more than once in the World Cup and the architect of some of those rescues, Edwards, had just come to the crease.Edwards is the best player of spin in his team. Before Friday, he had played three ODIs against Afghanistan and scored a half-century in all of them. Today, in Netherlands’ most important ODI against Afghanistan to date, he was dismissed first ball. Run-out.Edwards had no one to blame. Trying to sweep Nabi, he under-edged the ball and instinctively took off for a single, without realising it had rolled towards the wicketkeeper. Ikram Alikhil did to Edwards what Romesh Kaluwitharana had done to Sachin Tendulkar in the semi-final of the 1996 World Cup: he picked up the ball in a flash and broke the stumps before the batter could hurry back.Colin Ackermann put in a dive in vain•ICC via Getty ImagesBas de Leede ensured there was no hat-trick of run-outs but there was more to come. Netherlands were trying to resuscitate their innings when Roelof van der Merwe flicked one to midwicket in the 35th over. He and Engelbrecht froze mid-pitch for a moment and that was enough to catch Engelbrecht short at the striker’s end. For the first time in 4691 ODIs, a team had lost four of their top five to run-outs.Was this a freak occurrence, or an extreme consequence of a risk in Netherlands’ gameplan? Only once in seven matches this World Cup have Netherlands not had a batter run out. They have lost nine wickets to run-outs in this tournament; India are second with four.Netherlands are proud of their running between the wickets. To make up for shortfalls in other disciplines, they push fielders hard. Against Sri Lanka at this venue, they ran 27 twos.”We do pride ourselves on running between the wickets,” Netherlands’ head coach Ryan Cook said after the game. “Our turning technique and our running between the wickets in terms of the speed and stuff, we do a lot of training on that. Obviously, today, four run-outs – and not just any run-outs, No. 2, 3, 4 and 5 in your batting order getting run out – is not ideal.”So yeah, we’ll have to go back and have a look at that, but it won’t stop us, it is part of the DNA of our team and we’ll keep trying to run between the wickets and value every run as we do.”A fielding team cannot plan a run-out, but Afghanistan had done their homework and were on high alert. “Before the game, we said, ‘We definitely know they’re going to try to run well between wickets, but also it might present us with opportunities,'” their head coach Jonathan Trott said. “And that’s exactly what happened.”

Australia won't rush the search for Warner's successor

Desire to play best six batters may prompt team to push Labuschagne up to open the batting against West Indies

Alex Malcolm10-Dec-20231:30

Bailey: ‘Ultimately, Warner is in our best XI’

Australia’s selectors are unlikely to pull any surprises for the first Test of the home summer, against Pakistan on Thursday, but the conversation around who will replace David Warner once he retires continues to bubble away. Head coach Andrew McDonald once again hinted that they could lean towards picking the best six batters in a reshaped order rather than a specialist opener whenever a decision needs to be made.Despite a lot of external noise around the potential debut of express pace bowler Lance Morris, the home side looks set to make only one change from the last Test XI they fielded in the fifth Ashes Test at the Oval with Nathan Lyon returning from injury in place of Todd Murphy.Mitchell Marsh is set to remain at No. 6 while the big three quicks in Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins all looked in fine fettle at Australia’s first training session since being crowned ODI World Cup champions in Ahmedabad three weeks ago.McDonald did not name the XI that would face Pakistan at Perth Stadium but said “it will look the same as it did before” after the quicks had returned in very good shape from a long World Cup campaign. Lyon is also a welcome return after the head coach noted he was a “huge loss” for the final three Tests of the Ashes series that had “destabilised” Australia’s attack.

The hunt for Warner’s successor

In the absence of any selection debates in the lead-up to the first Test of the home summer, speculation continues to mount over how Australia’s batting line-up will shape up once Warner finishes. He has been guaranteed the first game against Pakistan and it seems very likely that he will play all three to get his desired Sydney Test send-off.Australia coach Andrew McDonald and captain Pat Cummins want to field their best available XI•Getty ImagesMcDonald reaffirmed the selection panel’s stated position that they would continue to pick the best Test XI for the here and now in the World Test Championship era, with future building not part of any current discussions. Still, there is continued interest over who ends up replacing Warner, prompting McDonald to double down on his previous statement on that a desire to pick the best six Test batters in the same side, which could include both Marsh and Cameron Green, might trump the need to blood in a new specialist opener.Related

  • Warner says 'shush' celebration was aimed at critics

  • 'We weren't expecting these kinds of arrangements' – Hafeez critical of Canberra conditions

  • Head rules himself out of being Australia Test opener

  • Carey finds 'silver lining' from World Cup snub, assures 'self-belief' still intact

  • 'He's got opening-itis' – Khawaja warns against Labuschagne promotion

“I think it feels as though anytime that you mention that you want to put your best six batters into the Test team, then there’s always speculation about who’s going to open and when Davey goes,” McDonald said.”We’ve got time to make that decision. Davey’s playing the first Test match and we’ll go from there. Until we have to make the decision, then it’ll continue to bubble away and the speculation will be there.”I think for us, it’s gathering information and making a decision when we need to make the decision. So that’s as simple as it gets. We’ve got no firm views on it at the moment.”It appears that part of the selectors thinking surrounding replacing Warner with Green rather than a specialist opener and then reshuffling the order to have either Marnus Labuschagne or Marsh open the batting is linked in with Australia’s fast bowling stocks. In any case, it seems unlikely that a decision will need to be made until the new year when West Indies arrive for a two-Test series in late January.The Prime Minister’s XI tour match against Pakistan did offer a lot of information to that end, but it was not the selection “bat-off” that some may have hoped it would be.”They all showed what they can do,” McDonald said. “We know that they’re all quality players. I thought Cameron Green was impressive again. Matt Renshaw clearly got a hundred, and a couple of starts to the other boys as well, a half-century and 49 to Cameron Bancroft and Marcus Harris. We know they can play. They’ve got good numbers in Sheffield Shield cricket and I think if we were to go down that path and choose one of them, I think they would do a really good job.”Lance Morris ramps it up in training•Getty Images

Morris closing in on Test bow

Despite a stated policy of selecting for the here and now, Morris remains an enticing prospect. He bowled a rapid spell in the centre-wicket practice at the WACA ground in Perth on Sunday, ruffling Labuschagne and Marsh at times with Marsh walking off wide-eyed at the pace he’d just faced.There is, however, an understanding that Morris has played almost all of his Sheffield Shield cricket for Western Australia as part of a five-man bowling attack with four fast bowlers and a spinner sharing the load so he could be used in short bursts as a strike weapon. His history of back stress fractures is also a factor in that thinking. In light of all that, Morris is only set to play for Australia this summer if one of the main three quicks, particularly Starc, misses a match through injury or soreness.Meanwhile, Marsh usurping Green as the team’s allrounder has created a headache for the selectors. While Marsh can bowl some very useful overs and will bowl throughout the home season, he cannot be banked upon for the same number of overs and the same bowling impact as Green given Marsh’s recent injury history. The Ashes series was the first time Marsh had played back-to-back first-class matches in four years. He experienced soreness that kept him off the field in the Old Trafford Test and meant he didn’t bowl at all during the subsequent eight-match white-ball tour of South Africa.If Morris were to play in Australia’s Test XI at some stage this summer or moving forward, it appears there would be a clear preference for Green to play in the same side, and if Marsh is entrenched on batting form, the selectors would need to find Green another place in the top six.For the moment, Green will carry the drinks in Perth as Australia remain wary of a Pakistan side that arrives down under in a state of never-ending flux. McDonald was unsure whether the positive new Test brand, the Pakistan Way, that had been unfurled in Sri Lanka in the middle of the year, would be replicated under a new captain and coach against the World Test Champions in a country where they have not won a Test match since 1995.”I think the last series they played, they played a more up-tempo brand,” McDonald said. “They’ll try and put more pressure on the bowling unit. So I think we’ll see a little bit of that. But like anything, if we execute well with the ball, it’s going to be difficult to be able to maintain that over long periods of time. So we’re not sure the way that they’ll play. They’ll signal their intent from the first ball once we get out there. We’ll see what happens.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus